www.darrenshan.com
When leaving comments, please DO NOT post any spoilers!!!
Use the calendar to access old entries. Highlighted dates show the days on which I have added posts.
www.darrenshan.com
Other cool blogs
|
 |
| |
Tuesday, November 27, 2007 |
Added some new photos to my web site today -- you can check them out by going to the DARREN SHAN SITE
and clicking on the PHOTOS link. Then spent a large part of the day
buying Christmas presents online. Computers have made Xmas shopping a
whole lot easier than it used to be -- I was able to order most of my
gifts online, which saves me the hassle of having to huff and puff
around the place looking for them! It's not so bad if you live in a
town or city, but when you live in the countryside like I do, Christmas
shopping can be a curse!!! My Christmas cards also came today (Bas and
I always design our own every year), so I'll probably start filling
those out later, meaning it's been a highly festive day all round!!! Watched the last four episodes of season 3 of Deadwood.
I'd normally have spaced them out more, but it sucked me in and I just
HAD to watch on!!! It was an excellent season overall, though I was
somewhat disappointed in the final episode. The entire season had been
leading up to a huge climax which never actually came -- instead it
just fizzled out quietly. A pity, as I was looking forward to gun
fights, massacres and blood aplenty. Oh well -- as Mick Jagger once so
aptly put it, "You can't always get what you want!!!!!"
| |
Monday, November 26, 2007 |
Memories are made of this
Read a fascinating article in the latest issue of National Geographic,
all about memory and how the brain functions. I already knew that the
brain was a mysterious organ, but it was enlightening to learn just how
little we really know about it, how it works, its potential, the way it
processes input and records or doesn't record memories. There was one
old man who is incapable of recording new memories -- he lives solely
in the present, sometimes eating breakfast three times in a morning
because he has no recollection of having eaten! Yet on some level his
brain functions normally -- he can go for a walk in his neighbourhood
and find his way back home every time; he doesn't remember any of his
neighbours consciously, but he knows he should feel comfortable around
them, as he would with friends. There was another lady who can remember
every day of her life since about the age of 10 or 11 -- if you ask her
what she watched on TV on a certain day 30 years ago, she can tell
you!!! Those of you who have read Bec will know why that bit intrigued me so much!
Memory,
the brain, and experience of time have always captivated me. I get
asked all the time "Where do your ideas come from?" But I can never
give an interesting answer because the question that needs to be
answered first, and which nobody can answer properly, is "Where do IDEAS
come from?" Conscious thought - and imagination on any level - is an
incredible achievement. Awareness of time, the past, the future, death
... the mind boggles when we try to analyse these capabilities. In some
strange ways we know more about the world and the universe than we do
about our own minds. We're like a computer that has been programmed to
react to input in certain ways. But computers don't KNOW that they've
been programmed. They're not self-aware. YET. Maybe they will be one
day. Maybe they'll evolve. And maybe that's how we started out,
programmed by a higher force, aliens, the universe ... who knows?!?
We
explore our minds as best we can, probing for answers in a variety of
ways. Science is one way, of course, but I believe literature is
another, and perhaps offers far more insights than science ever will. I
have a theory that mankind's growth and evolution can directly be
linked to the story-telling process, that our brains have developed
through use, by making up stories. Imagine it -- primitive man, sitting
in a cave late at night, wondering what's outside in the darkness. If
he only ever thought of real answers -- bears, tigers, other people --
I think we'd still be sitting in caves, not much more advanced than any
other species. But by using his imagination ... picturing monsters or
demons or giant animals ... putting himself into stories where he had
to use more than his common wits to survive ... learning to weave
memories and facts into those stories ... passing on his knowledge to
his children through stories, and interacting with them that way ...
That's
where I think society as we know it really got going. Stories are what
propelled us forward, what still drive us on. They're at the heart of
who we are and how we came this far. If we're to go further, it will be
because our imaginations demand it. If our brains develop even more, it
will be because we bombard them with stories and demand more of them.
We advance when we rise to meet challenges, but the world can only
challenge us to a limited extent. Stories, on the other hand, can keep
the challenges coming, generation after generation, each more advanced
and demanding than the one before. I don't fully understand where those
stories come from -- nobody does -- but I'm sure they're the key to
unlocking the mysteries of our minds, and from there the universe. And
after that? Well, I'm willing to bet there's even more to discover. The
thing about stories is, they never end. There's no stop to them. And
the next one always has to be bigger and better than the ones before if
it's to entertain and enlightened and intrigue.
Memories and stories. They're the building blocks of who we are and whatevr we might go on to achieve. Don't ever forget it!!!!!
| |
Sunday, November 25, 2007 |
Done with 9 (again) and updating site
Finished my latest edit of Book 9 of The Demonata
on Saturday. I'm much happier with it now -- it's taken four drafts,
but I finally think I've knocked it into shape and found a way to bring
pace and excitement to the slower, exposition-heavy sections. The
problems of the ninth book have been bugging me for most of the last
year, so I'm glad to (hopefully) have finally sorted them out!!
Went
out to my local pubs last night. I don't go out drinking locally very
often -- I'm not a heavy drinker, and usually only drink if I'm at a
football match or a concert. But it's nice to visit the local drinking
establishments every now and then, meet some friends and family, and
savour the atmosphere.
Spent today updating areas of my site, adding reviews and interviews. There haven't been many reviews of Demon Apocalypse
yet (a downside to releasing a book just four months after another is
that most reviewers opt to ignore it -- they don't like reviewing the
same author too often!), but I found several reviews of Blood Beast
which I was able to add. As with the other books in the series, almost
all the reviews have been glowing. I thought, way back when Lord Loss
was getting ready to see the light of day, that critics would
absolutely hate these gory, gruesome, fast-paced, death-filled books.
How wrong I was!!!
| |
Friday, November 23, 2007 |
Three replies for the price of one!
I received 3 emails today which tickled my interest, set me thinking
and prompted me to reply -- most unusual!!! Here they are, slightly
edited, in the order that they came in. First, from Janette Micklewright in England:
I
have been introduced to and practically force fed your books by my
neice. Its not often that I get into a whole series of books, least of
all childrens literature, but I have become a fan, old though I may be,
and I am writing to say that I think it's wonderful that Cirque is
going to become a movie. Not sure about John C Reilly playing Larten,
although he is a fine actor - I suppose everyone has their own mental
picture of Larten. I am sure the makeup people will do the rest! I hope
it will be a great success for you.
I am currently reading Demon Apocalypse
and if you ever find someone able to play Lord Loss and Artery in a
film, I very much doubt you will get a PG rating. It's a fabulous book
(the whole series actually) and I am thrilled that Bec is in the story
as Bec was my favourite to date. You give your child characters an
adult awareness of sorrow and the need to take responsibility in
situations where they must stand and not run away. Your characters face
heavy responsibilities and I think they give good messages to your
younger (and not so young) readers.
Alice
(my neice) has been terrified of werewolves since she was at primary
school, when some little charmer in the playground told her they were
real and could tear her to pieces - you must be some storyteller to get
her to read your work and I can't thank Grubbs enough!
Janette isn't the first to ask about a Demonata
film. At the moment there aren't any plans to turn the books into a
movie. To be honest, I'm in two minds whether I'd like to see it
adapted or not. As Janette points out, it would be VERY hard to make a
kid's film out of Lord Loss
and its sequels! You can get away with a lot in books that you just
can't do in a movie. If a movie maker was to keep even a fifth of the
gore in this series, it would still be an 18 Cert film in the UK or an
R in the USA!!! So what, if someone ever tries to make it, will be the
answer? Carefully trim the gore? Allude to violence rather than show
it? Make it an adult's movie, perhaps turning Grubbs into an older
teenager or even a grown-up? I'm not sure. I'll obviously be interested
if a movie company comes to me with a plan, and I'd take their views
into careful consideration, but for the time being I'd have to say I'm
in no rush to see these books filmed -- I think they might be just too
damn demonic for Hollywood!!!! Then again, wouldn't it be wonderful if
some skilled team proved me wrong ...
Next up, Megan Smith-Foster from Canada:
I
love your series. I'm an avid reader of Stephen King, a well-known and
renowned horror novelist, so I do know what it taks for a book to be
scary. Your books certainly have what it takes. I've finished five of
your books from "The Demonata" in less than a week; I was addicted, and
when I saw the "to be continued..." in cryptic italics, I screamed and
shook the book (just thought you should know). I rarely see other
authors write in the first person so fluidly, and those who do -
coughAnneRicecough - don't have the same hold on a character's persona,
and maintain it, as you can/do.
I'm
actually an author upstart myself, and I'm not going to push a story on
you (I hear most authors absolutely hate that, and if I were you, I'd
be no exception), but seeing the creativity, the morbid fascination you
inspire in readers (since I've begun reading, I've been dropping hints
about "Lord Loss"s plot, I got my friend addicted as well!) and clearly
have yourself, makes it easier for me to have my ideas out there. My
parents have read my pilot beginnings for my books, and they threatened
to take me to a psychologist, wondering why a 14, 15, 16 (my current
age) year old girl would write such terrible, dark things. And that, as
I'm sure you know, is the secret nobody knows; why we write the way we
do. Are we twisted, ravenous, soon-to-be killers? Are we emotionally
disturbed? Maybe. But mostly... it's intrigue. The thrill we get from
reading a scary book, and, in the back of our minds, wondering if all
this could possibly be real. But I'm rambling. Apologies.
But
my point is, Mr Shan, that your books have inspired me to move past the
worried parents, the possibility or threat that I will be told that I'm
crazy, or disturbed, or something to that effect (I know when I started
reading Stephen King, that REALLY didn't help). The world is strange
that way; most humans can't accept the things we have not seen, nor
cannot comprehend, and therefore, they shun what is different from the
norm. You r take on human state of mind is so clear and consise, it
makes me want to give myself a second analysis.
In
short, I'd like to give you thanks. You've taken horror to a level some
can only hope to comprehend or acheive, and, I BEG you, if you are to
make a movie of your books, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DIRECT AND WRITE THE
SCRIPT! I will not watch another movie that inaccurately portrays a
book and its characters for the infuriating sake of 'time'.
Well, I won't be writing or directing the film of Cirque Du Freak,
and it certainly WILL make big changes to the books, but as I've said
often in my blogs, I think that's a good thing -- movies should
reinvent their source material, not just copy it. Regarding Megan's
gruesome stories, I told her (and her parents) not to worry. I
wrote FAR darker, grislier, gorier stories when I was a teenager!!! I
think a lot of teens go OTT on the gore front because at that stage
you're probably not equipped to write a "good" story. But you want to
make an impression, so you throw in anything you think will shake
readers up. In later years, as your skills advance, you come to learn
that less can be more, and cut down on the gore in order to give the
characters more room to breathe. So any of you pushing the envelope of
good taste, don't worry, you're not going crazy!!! And tell your
parents not to worry either -- it's just a Teen Thing!!!!
Finally, Amy Beth Cesar, also from Canada:
I'm
sure you're probably just sick of fan-mail by now, must get really
monotonous, just thought i would bombard you with another! But that's
neither here nor there, i have to say that you have an AMAZING
collection of literature, and i am hooked. My good friend Gemmy
explained a few main aspects of The Demonata series to me, mere mention
of Lord Loss got me craving to read the series already. Sad,
but i have a tendency to only read books on and off, because they
disinterest me after awhile. However, my friend gave me the first book
in this series, and i finished it in a few hours. I couldn't bear to
rip my eyes off!
I
am a huge fan of psychology in books, mysteries, and especially horror.
The ones that make you think, or truly dig deep into your mind. Your
characters have a profound nature to them... they are well thought out,
and feel like real people to me. They are creative, and stand out to
me... (especially the names!) and that is such a huge factor to me, i
suppose. The characters make up the story, and it's what makes the
story and gives it that profound "OOMPH!" to it.
My
very favourite villain of any book i have ever read is Hannibal Lecter
(Don't ask why a 16-year-old girl loves to read about cannibalistic
criminal master-minds), despite any story, and movie, and book i have
ever read, no one has ever come close to how much i loved his
character. Until now that is, Lord Loss is so close to my favourite
villain now, he's so different... there is more to him than meets the
eye.
But
anyways, past ripping my eyes out of your book, I don't normally sit
here having a conniption, but i'm just so infatuated with your writings
already, i can't help it. Please excuse me for that (I don't normally
gush, but yeah!). Unlike my friend, i am not much of an author as she
is... like i mentioned before, i am more attracted to characters. I
build them very well, i just don't seem to make stories very well.
Though i have an attraction with reading horror now, it often frightens
my family, and causes them to think of me strangely. My mother comes
across me reading When the Cicadas Cry, and she'll give me a strange glance before walking off. I'd
love to indulge in the thought that i'm not crazy, but yet again,
neither here nor there. Either way, you've proven to me that girls, and
anyone, can love horror and the macabre without being thrown into an
asylum.
But
to conclude now, since i'm probably jut gabbing your ear off here. I
can hardly wait for the whole Demonata series to come out, and i can't
wait to read the rest of your literature either. I just can't rip away
from your stories. The combination of Magicians, a cursed Lycanthrope
bloodline and demons, i just can't wait!
Hannibal
the Cannibal is one of my favourite characters too!!! Though I hadn't
made the connection before, I guess Lord Loss DOES share certain
characteristics with him. What made Dr Lecter so memorable was his humanity.
Yes, he was a clinical, genius killer, but there have been plenty of
those before (going back to Professor Moriarty in the Sherlock Holmes
stories). What made him stand out was his relationship with Agent
Starling, the strange feelings he had for her. In the midst of his evil
ways, we sensed stirrings of love, someone who wasn't THAT different to
us at his core, and I think that's why he freaked us out so much -- we
were able to see shades of ourselves in him, and it's never comfortable
when you realise that "There but for the grace of God go I!!"
My
demons, as some fans have noted, are fairly one-dimensional. They live
to kill -- simple as that. No grey areas, no underlying psychological
motives, nothing fancy. That was deliberate -- I wanted them to be
straight-up monsters, determined to destroy, beings you can't reason or
plead with. But Lord Loss is the exception to the rule. His love of
chess and human suffering intrigues us. Although he's clearly not
human, and will never share our nobler sentiments (mercy, compassion,
forgiveness, etc), he has certain human traits -- almost vices. We can
see reflections of ourselves in the lowly demon master, and that draws
us closer to him, and as we draw close we find ourselves repulsed, yes
... but also fascinated and, dare I suggest it, somewhat jealous? I
mean, wouldn't we all like the total freedom of Hannibal Lecter or Lord
Loss, the freedom to do anything we wished, to have no sense of guilt,
to torture and kill the same way we'd brush our teeth or walk a dog? I
think most of us feel a need to do the right thing, and a sense of
contentment when we do. But down deep we know life would be easier and
probably a lot more fun (on a vicious, inhuman level) if we abandoned
our nobler ideals and ran wild. Most of us never do that, and it's
RIGHT that we shouldn't. But that doesn't stop us thinking about it, or
finding ourselves drawn to those in literature who have the freedom to
go places we don't wish to really go to, but wish to somehow, in some distracted way, experience ...
Night
night, people. And don't worry if your nightmares lead you down alleys
dark and seductively menacing. There's nothing wrong with exploring
such places ... as long as you only do it in your dreams ...
| |
Thursday, November 22, 2007 |
Back on normal editing ground
Watched England lose 3-2 to Croatia last night, meaning there will be
NO team from these isles at the 2008 European Championship -- not
England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland or Northern Ireland. That's the first
time since 1984 that no country from these two islands has qualified
for a major championship. Grim days indeed!!! While I'm first and
foremost an Ireland fan, if we're not in a competition, I would always
throw my support behind (or at least look on with interest) England or
Scotland or whoever. This means I'll have no vested interest at all in
the games next summer -- it will be a purely academic contest as far as
I'm concerned. *SIGH*
On a more positive note, I got back to my
normal editing ways this afternoon. I spent the early part of the day
writing some new material for book 8 of The Demonata,
but then it was back to simply editing, not re-writing. There might be
another scene further down the line that I have to adjust, but I don't
think so -- it looks like I might be in the clear for the rest of the
book's run ...
Received the following very nice email from a teacher called Michelle in Canada:
I am a high school teacher in Oromocto, New Brunswick, Canada. I want you to know how much my students enjoy The Darren Shan Saga.
I've been using this series as a read aloud for the past two years with
my grade 9's and 11's. They cannot get enough, and each class starts
with someone asking, "Are we reading Darren Shan today?" A few
students have sped by me and they are well ahead of the class in the
series.
Many
of the boys have told me that they had not read a complete novel until
I introduced them to this series. They are completely spellbound by
your work. I had to ask the librarian to buy the series for the school
because they were in such high demand. I have even suggested to my
babysitter's daughter that she read this saga as she is a reluctant
reader herself; she is now on the second novel in the series.
As
a parent and educator, I appreciate that you have written books that
are highly interesting, but are innocent enough for young adults. Truly
your work is magical. I have been known to read aloud in class for half
an hour without a student making a sound - it's amazing the impact your
books have on my students.
I
have never been one to email authors, I figure you have a lot of fans
and a lot on your plate, but I have never seen books become so popular
in my 8 years of teaching. I felt it was necessary to contact you to
express my gratitude for creating books that easily promote literacy in
my classroom. Thanks again for sharing your talent with my students, and I wish you continued success.
Awwww
... I love it when an email like that pops through!!! I don't think any
author ever gets so busy that they don't want to read feedback like
this -- and more fool them if they do!!!! Success can distance you
somewhat from your audience -- it might become impossible to reply to
every email or letter, to go to every school which requests a visit --
but you should never let it drive a wedge between you. Responses like
this are why I became a writer in the first place, and if all the money
and trappings pass away (as they somtimes do), at least I'll have
emails and letters like this to remember and come back to -- and
ultimately I think that's what matters most. You shouldn't become a
writer to makes loads of money and get famous -- you should do it in
the hope of telling a story that will reach out and touch people. If
you can do that, you've done all that any writer should ever ask or
expect of themselves -- and anything after that is a bonus.
| |
Wednesday, November 21, 2007 |
I started another edit of book 9 of The Demonata
yesterday. This has been the most troublesome book of the series, by
far. I'm trying to achieve the balance between imparting a lot of facts
(which the book has to do) while keeping it pacy and entertaining at
the same time. I came up short on previous drafts, but each one has
been a bit better, and I've got some fresh angles to come at it from
this time. Editing is normally quite easy for me, involving mostly
tinkering about with what I've already written, trimming it down or
sharpening it up slightly. But sometimes I have to re-write scenes or
create new ones, and I never actively enjoy that. When I'm doing a
first draft I fall into a certain mindset -- I know the book is going
to take time, that I can't rush it, and I'm happy to take things day by
day, page by page, churning out the words. I'm normally fairly patient
when working on a first draft, content to put in the time it takes to
write such a large amount of new material. But when I come to the
editing process I like to move faster, to get into the flow of the
story, to try and see what readers are going to experience. When I have
to write new material, that slows me down, and I know I'm going to have
to do another, extra edit to get back into the flow of the book --
which is frustrating!!! It has to be done -- if a scene isn't working,
it has to be fixed -- but in a way I begrudge having to do it. It's
like part of my brain is screaming at me: "We already did this part of
the work! What the hell are you up to?!?" I'll be fine once I'm done,
and I'm sure I'll be very pleased when I come back and do my next edit,
having (hopefully!!!) sorted out the problems in the book. But right
now I'm a bit grumpy. Ah well -- that's all part of a writer's lot! If
work was TOO easy, I suppose it would get a bit boring after a while ...
Lots
of you have emailed me to congratulate me on the movie news. Many
thanks to everyone who's written. I have read all the emails coming in,
but haven't been able to respond to many -- the new book must take
precedence!!!
Saw a great film called Little Children
yesterday, starring Kate Winslet. Not a kid's film, to be sure, but a
very thoughtful, thought-provoking, funny and moving tale about how
complicated adult life can be. Also saw the last episode of the first
half of season 6 of The Sopranos.
I can't wait to tear through the final few episodes, but I'm going to
make myself wait for a while, to savour the anticipation. So today I
started watching season 3 of Deadwood. Westerns were never like this when I was a child!!!!!
| |
Tuesday, November 20, 2007 |
Lights! Camera! Cirque Du Freak!!!
Remember that BIG news I mentioned last week? Well, here it is!!!! It's been a long time coming, but I'm delighted to be able to announce that the Cirque Du Freak movie is due to begin filming in February 2008!!! This is the official announcement from Universal, the company making the film: "Cirque du Freak" by Darren Shan – Movie Announcement The
"Cirque du Freak" series of bestselling children's novels by Irish
author Darren Shan has been acquired by Universal Pictures and will be
adapted for a motion picture of the same name. The film is due to
begin shooting in February 2008 in New Orleans under the direction of
Paul Weitz (About A Boy, In Good Company), and will star John C. Reilly (Gangs of New York, Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story) as Larten Crepsley; Josh Hutcherson (Bridge to Terabithia)
as Steve Leonard; and newcomer Chris Kelly as Darren Shan. Weitz is
adapting some of the storylines from the novels for the screen. He and
Lauren Shuler Donner (X-Men) will produce for their production companies, Depth of Field and The Donner's Company. There's not much more for me to add, except -- whoopee!!!!
There's no telling how the film will turn out, but I think it's in very
safe, capable hands, and I'm really excited about the cast so far. I've
seen Josh Hutcherson in a number of films (most recently R.V. with Robin Williams), and I've been a BIG John C Reilly fan since I saw him in Boogie Nights -- he never seems to put in anything but an excellent performance. No
release date has yet been set for the movie, so ignore any online
rumours you might come across. As soon as I know anything more about
that, and about other cast members, I'll include the info in the
Shanville Monthly -- I plan to keep fans regularly updated over the
next few months. You can also look up Cirque Du Freak on IMDB -- that's where you'll be able to find details about the crew. I know a lot of you have been dreaming of a Cirque Du Freak
movie for a number of years -- I've received emails and letters about
it virtually every day since the first book was published back in
January 2000! Now, at last, the dream is poised to become a reality -- hurrah!!!!! I hope you're all as psyched about the news as I am! Of
course I know, equally, that some of you aren't keen on a movie
adaptation at all! All I have to say to you guys is -- tough!!!! 
Naw, seriously, my attitude to movie adaptations is the same as Stephen
King's -- sell the rights to your stories freely, keep out of the movie
side of things once you sell the rights, and keep your fingers
crossed!!! King's books have probably been the source material for more
bad movies than any other writer's -- but at the same time there's been
The Shining, the original version of Salem's Lot, Stand By Me and The Shawshank Redemption.
If I was Stephen King, I'd happily put up with a dozen stinkers if it
meant being able to be associated with any one of those four films. You
never know how a movie adptation will fare. Lots of great books have
been turned into terrible films, and likewise some bad books have been
turned into great movies. It's a lottery. But as someone who loves
films, I think it's worth taking the risk. If Cirque Du Freak
becomes a great movie, I'll be there in a cinema with the rest of you,
lapping it up. I love seeing my stories get to places I never thought
they were, and seeing other creative minds play about with them. In
Japan the manga adaptation has far surpassed my expectations, and I get
a great buzz when I read each new episode, seeing my story
re-interpreted and served back to me as something new. In a way,
because I never actually read any of my books once they see print,
reading the manga is the first time I've been able to experience the
story the same way you guys have, as something fresh and surprising. I'm hoping
the movie will go as well as the manga, that they'll produce something
that does the books justice, that recreates the story in a different
way. It will be VERY different to the books in terms of structure and
pace, but that's fine -- a good film SHOULD reinterpret and add
something new to the mix. I see no point in making a film that JUST
does what the book does -- in that case, nothing new is brought into
the world. I WANT Universal to play around with the books and find a
new way to tell the story. You never know -- they might find a BETTER
way!!!! And if they don't? If the movie disappoints? If it goes the way
of Eragon or The Dark Is Rising?
Well, what if it does?!? I don't subscribe to the "A bad movie ruins a
good book" theory -- that's just childish nonsense!!!! Raymond Chandler
was once asked if he thought a bad movie had ruined his book -- he
laughed, pointed to a copy of the book on his shelf, and said "The
book's right there. It hasn't changed in the slightest. It's just as
good as it always was." And Chandler was right. The movie is
something different, an aside, a project in a separate medium. I'll be
watching developments with interest, hoping for the best, but I'm not
overly concerned because, no matter what happens with it, THE BOOKS ARE
STILL THERE. I know some fans don't make that distinction, that they
can turn against a book if a bad film comes along. But to me that's
like turning against a good song just because some crap band covers it.
The Beatles have been covered by loads of awful bands over the decades,
but that doesn't spoil the original songs, not as far as I'm concerned.
Those songs will always be special -- if you don't like a particular
cover, you simply ignore it. I take the same view with books and movies
-- if someone comes along and makes a bad film out of a book I love,
that doesn't turn me against the book -- I simply ignore the film!! But hopefully I won't have to ignore Cirque Du Freak.
I'm impressed by the quality of the people involved with it, and I know
they're talking to other actors of a very high quality, so I've got a
pretty good feeling about it. I think it could turn out to be something
special. We won't know for sure until it's released, but I'm feeling a
lot more positive than I might have been. The more I think about what
John C Reilly might do with Mr C, the more intrigued I become. He might
not be what a lot of you were expecting, but then a good movie always
throws out a few surprises -- back in the early 1970s, most movie folks
thought Al Pacino was completely wrong for the main lead in The Godfather -- but I don't hear too many people moaning about him now!!!!! Oh, one final thing, to those who have been complaining about the movie being set in America. Why shouldn't it be?!? Cirque Du Freak
was NEVER set anywhere specific. Some people have been saying it should
be filmed in Britain -- but that's only because in their imaginations
the books were set there. When I wrote CDF, I wanted it to work for
readers all around the world -- if it became successful, I wanted it to
be a book that ANYONE could read and relate to, ANYWHERE in the world.
That's why I kept it vague, and never mentioned any country or city
names. I've always been happy for publishers in different countries to
give it their own slant, to use their own slang phrases, currencies,
etc, to make it seem as if the story is set in THEIR country. It sounds
corny, but I wanted the books to "belong" to the world. With the movie,
that level of vagueness wasn't a possibility -- it HAD to be set
SOMEWHERE. Even if they didn't give the places a name, people would be
able to identify the setting by the accents. I know Universal
considered using actors from other countries, and still are for many of
the parts, but I wasn't surprised or disappointed when they opted to
film it in the States and chose Americans for the leads -- I think that
was always going to be the case. Anyway, as I've said, I'm VERY
excited about this, and I'll be keenly following the progress of
filming (and reporting back to you lot as often as I can) over the
coming months. We're moving into a whole new field with this, and for
better or worse, I think it's going to be an interesting experience for
all of us ...
| |
Monday, November 19, 2007 |
Had a quiet Sunday. Went for a drive and to visit a Christmas store, did some stuff on the web, and watched a film -- Castle in the Sky,
by Japan's fabulous Hayao Miyazaki. One of his earlier films (1986), it
started a bit slowly, but built impressively, looked absolutely
gorgeous, and was quirky and inventive. Like most of his films, this
one comes VERY highly recommended! After that we went in to town with
my friend Kenny to see the RTE 2FM 2moro 2our. It's basically three
bands on a tour of Ireland, sponsored by RTE 2FM. This is the third
tour, and we saw the first, which was really good. The bands didn't
impress me too much this time, although one of them -- the woefully
named Ham Sandwich -- were quite good. Still, it was a nice night out,
and we didn't get back home and to bed (after a guilty trip to
Abrakebabra!!!!) until 02.00. Slept in late this morning and didn't do too much later, apart from answer emails, watch more of The Sopranos and Twilight Zone.
Also saw the recent documentary about Wal-Mart, and how poorly they
treat their employees -- fairly shocking to see a company getting away
with behaviour like this, but corporate greeds runs rife throughout the
world, I think, and here it seems to be at its purest and vilest. I
also posted my notes for Demon Apocalypse
to my web site at last. I think the notes for this one are particularly
informative, as far as trying to explain how I put books together when
I'm working on a series, BUT I don't recommend you read them unless
you've read Demon Apocalypse, as they contain MAJOR PLOT SPOILERS!!! The link for those who've read the book is: DEMON APOCALYPSE NOTES
| |
Saturday, November 17, 2007 |
atest edit of Book 8 of The Demonata.
I ploughed through more than 60 pages, which is quite a lot, but not
unheard of for me. I always zip through the last third of book 8 at
high speed -- it's a really fast-moving, action-packed stretch that
sucks me in every time. I'm very pleased with how the book stands --
now to tackle the more troublesome book 9 again ...
I sometimes
get asked how I feel when I finish a book. A lot of people have this
notion that authors write a book in a frantic daze, one feverish edit
after another, and then ... just ... draw ... to ... a ... stop ... and
punch the air, light up a cigar, sit back and bask in the glory of a
job well done. Well, I'm sure there are
writers who work that way, but I'm certainly not one of them. For me
it's a series of "finishes". Completing the first draft is a biggie --
an unifinished first draft is like a huge mountain, waiting to be
climbed, and until you get to the last line you can't say for certain
that you'll make it all the way to the summit. but I know my job has
just begun, and that I'll have to go through the book another 6 or 7
times, over 2 or 3 years. So I can't, y'know, get actually excited
about it. It's a bit like if your team scores a goal in the first ten
minutes of a match -- it gives you a great buzz, but you know there's a
LONG way yet to go, and only a fool celebrates so early. Subsequent
finishes are kind of like scoring more goals in a one-sided match --
it's a bit like Brazil playing Luxembourg. Once the first goal goes in,
you KNOW that more will follow, so although each edit ("goal") brings
pleasure, it's not like scoring the winning goal in the last minute of
a cliffhanger of a match. By the time I get to the very last edit, I
feel a bit tired of the whole thing -- I've put a lot of work in, I'm
usually proud of what I've achieved, but I know the job is drawing to a
close and I'm busy looking forward to the next book (in fact I'm always
busy working on the next
book!!). Seeing it in print is always nice, but there's never a point
where I cut loose and go on a wild celebratory spree.
Writing
for me is a long series of small pleasures, not wild joys. When I
publish a book, I don't get the feeling that a lottery winner gets when
they win big. I suspect most other writers are similar. But in the long
run, satisfaction is far better, I think, than exhilaration. Winning
the lottery only gives you a short burst of joy -- you might live
happily off the proceeds for the rest of your life, but you'll only
have a few days of giddy, disbelieving euphoria. With writing, there
isn't so much excitement, but the smaller thrills and pleasures can be
spread out over months, years, even decades. We live in a society which
pushes the notion of immediate, big-time buzzes -- you're a "success"
if you achieve FAME! NOW!! WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING TO EARN IT!!! The
media glorifies short-term stars, builds them up swiftly, fans the
flames of their success for a while, then drops interest in them just
as quickly. You need to ask yourself, what will make you happier in
life -- having a brief burst of fame and riches when you're young, then
living off nothing but memories for the rest of your life? Or working
hard and getting to enjoy the rewards of your achievements (even if
they're only modest rewards) through your thirties, forties, fifties,
sixties??? I think it's pretty clear what I think, but I'm not arrogant
enough to believe that my view is superior -- maybe it IS better to
soar high and briefly, and burn out quick. It's always personal -- each
one of us must decide what matters, what will bring us pleasure in
life. What works for one person won't for another. All I'm saying is,
don't let the media's obssession with temporary fame turn your head.
Thing through your goals and choices. Do what WORKS for you -- not what
is EXPECTED OF you. Define the terms of what YOU think is success, then
go and try and achieve them, no matter what everybody else thinks, no
matter what dreams others are chasing. We get one shot at this life,
people -- do you want to live it YOUR way, or just go along with what
other people have decided is the flow?
| |
Friday, November 16, 2007 |
Edited a bit more of Book 8 of The Demonata,
but it was a day of various distractions -- mostly on the internet --
and I didn't get as much done as I meant to. But I'm not too worried --
I'm well ahead of my publication schedule and winding the year down. I
plan to keep my hand in, editing, right through to the end of the year,
but I'm not going to push myself too hard. I've had a busy, productive
2007, and I think I've earned the right to have a few lazyish days in
the final month or so!!! I always like to ease up a bit towards the end
of a year -- the occasional break from work can make you appreciate it
all the more ...
Haven't been able to announce the BIG news yet,
because of certain factors I have no control over. It looks like it
will be mid next week before I can trumpet it around. But some of you
have managed to find out about it already, by scouring the web. Feel
free to discuss it with others if you're one of the few in the know --
this is a nice, lull before the storm sort of time. I imagine the
message boards and other fan sites will be hopping aggressively once
the news becomes common knowledge ...
I hope you all have a fun,
relaxing weekend. I might be out for quite a bit of it, so if you don't
hear from me until Monday, worry not -- I'll be having a good time!!
|